Pharmacognostical Studies on
Stem of Fagonia schweinfurthii Hadidi
Manoj K. Rathore*,
Mahesh C. Sharma, M. Goyal, G. K. Singh and B. P. Nagori
Lachoo Memorial College of Science and Technology, Pharmacy Wing, Jodhpur,
Rajasthan, India
ABSTRACT:
Fagonia is a genus of plant in the family Zygophyllaceae is represented in
Egypt by 18 species but it was represented by 15 species in Boulos,
2000 and by about 167 species around Mediterranean, Asia and in the North
America. Fagonia schweinfurthii
(family Zygophyllaceae)
is a plant of desert region. It is commonly known as dhamasa
and dhamasia. It is small, spiny, erect, undershrubs, more and less grandullar;
branches slander, terete, triage, glabrous.
Leaves opposite, 1-3 foliate; petioles very variable in length, from 3 - 30 mm
long, deeply striate, very slender; stipules 2 pairs of sharp slender thorns,
sometimes exceeding 12 mm in length; leaflets linear, acute, sessile or with
very short petiolules. Traditionally, the plant has been used to cure a number of ailments by
the people living in desert region such as skin eruptions, in heal sores, skin diseases, anti-pyretic, in pain relief, ear infection,
venereal diseases, etc. many other diseases. The present paper deals with
comprehensive pharmacognostical studies on stem part
of this plant, including macroscopical analysis,
preliminary examination of stem powder, florescence analysis. This will help in
the identification of powder drug prior using in any herbal formulations.
KEYWORDS: Fagonia schweinfurthii,
skin disease, venereal disease, macroscopical analysis.
INTRODUCTION:
Desert plants are
unique adaptation from environmental conditions. Fagonia
L. occurs in warm and arid regions of all continents except Australia. Fagonia is a
genus of plant in the family Zygophyllaceae is represented in Egypt by 18 species but it
was represented by 15 species in Boulos, 2000 and by
about 167 species around Mediterranean, Asia and in the North America8,12. This species has a restricted global distribution
occurring in Pakistan and India. Within India, it has been recorded in the
upper gangetic plains and Tamil Nadu (Coimbatore, Ramnathapuram)12,14,. Species of Fagonia
were taxonomically and ecologically studied in different studies. Fagonia species were extensively studied by
many workers regarding their medicinal uses, since these plants were antitumor,
antioxidant, analgesic, astringent, febrifuge and prophylactic against
small-pox agents, species of Fagonia were
also used for the treatment of cancer in the indigenous system, fever, asthma,
urinary discharges, toothache, stomach troubles and kidney diseases25.
Species of Fagonia have been found to
contain saponins, alkaloids, terpenoids,
sterols, flavonoids, proteins and amino acids, coumarins, trace elements8.
Fagonia schweinfurthii
(family zygophyllaceae)
is a plant of desert region. It is found from arid and semiarid areas of
Rajasthan state in India in Jodhpur, Barmer, Bikaner,
Churu, Jaiselmer, Jhunjhunu, Sikar and Shri Ganganagar districts. It is
commonly known as dhamasa and dhamasia. It is small, spiny, erect, undershrubs, more and less grandullar;
branches slander, terete, triate, glabrous.
Leaves opposite, 1-3
foliate; petioles very variable in length, from 3 - 30 mm long, deeply striate,
very slender; stipules 2 pairs of sharp slender thorns, sometimes exceeding 12
mm in length; leaflets linear, acute, sessile or with very short petiolules20. Traditionally, the plant has been used to cure a
number of ailments by the people living in desert region such as skin eruptions, in heal sores, skin diseases, anti-pyretic, in pain relief, ear infection,
venereal diseases, etc. many other diseases11,
12.
The present paper
deals with comprehensive pharmacognostical studies on
stem part of this plant, including macroscopical
analysis, preliminary examination of stem powder, florescence analysis, as well
as behaviour of stem powder with different chemical reagents. This will help in
the identification of powder drug prior using in any herbal formulations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Collection of plant materials:
This plant was collected
from the Mandore hills of Jodhpur (Rajasthan) in the
month of March, and authenticated by Botanical Survey of India, Jodhpur. The
specimen has been submitted to the Departement of
Pharmacognosy, Lachoo Memorial College of Science andTechnology, Jodhpur and Rajasthan for future reference.
Macroscopical Analysis:
Shade dried stem of Fagonia schweinfurthii was evaluated for its morphological and sensory
profile by observing of its colour, odour, taste, size, shapes, special feature like touch,
texture and fracture1, 4, 6, 9, 11,
13, 23.
Powder
Analysis of stem powder:
Powdered drug was cleared with chloral hydrate solution by
heating on water bath for 5 mins. and it was placed on a microscolpical
glass slide with a brush , mounted with glycerine
and treated with different staining reagents to give different color reactions for indication of presence or absence of respective cell contents7,
10, 15, 18.
Florescence
Analysis of stem powder:
Florescence analysis of stem powder of Fagonia schweinfurthii was carried out by the treatment of different chemical
reagents such as 50% H2SO4, 50% HNO3, 5% KOH,
CH3OH, 1N HCl, 1N methonolic
NaOH, C2H5OH (95%), 1N ethonolic NaOH, acetone with it
and powder as such and it was observed under visible and UV light for
florescence2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12,
13, 17, 26 .
Physicochemical
parameters:
Different physicochemical parameters such as foreign
organic matter, loss on drying, swelling index, foaming index, total ash value, acid insoluble ash value, water soluble ash
value, sulphated ash value, ether extractive value, ethanolic extractive value and water soluble extractive
value were determined as per standard procedures recommended in WHO guideline2, 5, 9, 10, 19, 22, 23, 24.
Examination of powdered plant material (stem) for
preliminary tests:
The stem powder was examined for its organoleptic characteristics and the general and micro
chemical tests were performed with powder and its aqueous extract16, 21, 24.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Macroscopical Analysis:
The stems of Fagonia schweinfurthii are 5-10 cm. long and 4-9 mm in
diameter. The wood of the stem is white, very hard and covered with a ragged
light brown bark which becomes shiny and mucilaginous when moistened. Odour
characteristics, taste bitter and acrid, slightly wrinkled surface, fracture is
short Fig: 1.
Powder
Analysis of stem powder:
Powder microscopic examination of the
stem powder of Fagonia schweinfurthii
revealed
the presence of parenchymatous
tissues, starch, tannin, cellulose, oil glands and lignified tissue. The result
of powder microscopic of stem powder is shown in Table [1].
Table [1]: Powder analysis of stem powdered of Fagonia schweinfurthii.
|
S. No. |
Test for |
Reagent |
Observation |
Result |
|
1. |
Parenchymatous tissue |
Safranin |
Pink colour |
+ |
|
2. |
Starch |
Iodine |
Blue colour |
+ |
|
3. |
Tannin |
FeCl3 solution (10%
w/v) |
Black colour |
+ |
|
4. |
Cellulose |
Conc. H2SO4 |
Green colour |
+ |
|
5. |
Lignified tissue |
Dil HCl + Pinch of phloroglucinol |
Magenda colour |
+ |
|
6. |
Oil glands |
Sudan red III |
No pink colour |
- |
|
7. |
Mucilage |
Ruthenium red |
Pink colour |
+ |
|
8. |
Calcium carbonate crystals |
Conc. HCl |
No effervescence |
- |
|
9. |
Calcium oxalate crystals |
Cons. H2SO4 |
No effervescence |
- |
Florescence
Analysis of stem powder:
The stem powder of Fagonia schweinfurthii was treated with
different chemical reagents and observed under visible and UV light. The result
of florescence analysis of stem powder is shown in Table [2].
Table [2]: Florescence analysis of stem powdered of Fagonia schweinfurthii.
|
Treatment of
powder stem |
Florescence
observed |
|
|
Under Visible
light |
Under UV light |
|
|
Powder as such 50%H2SO4 50%HNO3 5% KOH CH3OH 1N HCl 1N methonolic NaOH C2H5OH (95%) 1N ethonolic NaOH Acetone |
Light green Light green Light green Light green Light green Light green Light green Light green Light green Dark green |
Green Grey Grey Yellow Yellow Grey Yellow Light yellow Yellow Grey |
Physicochemical
parameters:
Different physicochemical parameters such as foreign
organic matter, loss on drying, swelling index, foaming index, total ash value, acid insoluble ash value, water soluble ash
value, sulphated ash value, ether extractive value, ethanolic extractive value and water soluble extractive
value were determined as per standard procedures recommended in WHO guideline.
Results are given in Table [3].
Table [3]: Represent the results of physicochemical parameters of stem
powder Fagonia schweinfurthii.
|
Parameter |
Limits |
|
Foreign organic matter Loss on drying Swelling index Foaming index Total ash value Acid insoluble ash value Water soluble ash value Sulphated ash value Ether extractive value Ethanolic extractive value Water extractive value |
0.34% 9.0%
w/w 6.0% Less than 100 8.44% 0.5% 1.95% 13.60% 1.61% 22.40% 23.20% |
Examination of powdered plant material (stem) for
preliminary tests:
The stem powder was examined for its organoleptic characteristics and the general and microchemical tests were performed with powder and its
aqueous extract. Results are shown in Table
[4].
Table [4]:
Preliminary examination of stem powdered of Fagonia schweinfurthii.
|
S. No. |
Test |
Observation |
Result |
|
1. |
Organoleptic chacteristics:- Colour Odour Taste |
Light green Characterstic Bitter |
|
|
2. |
General and Microchemical
tests (With powder/Aq. Ext.) Test for I) Saponins (Powder + dist. water) |
Frothing |
+ |
|
|
II) Tannins (Powder+FeCl3 sol) |
Dark colourations |
+ |
|
|
III) Anthraquinones a) (Powder + Ammonia sol.) b) (Powder +
5% w/v KOH sol.) |
Ammonical layer showed no pink colour No blood red colour |
- - |
|
|
IV)
Mucilage (Powder + dist. water) |
Swelling with water |
- |
|
|
V)
Carbohydrates (Powder
+ Molisch’s reagent) |
Violet ring formed |
- |
|
|
VI)
Alkaloids (Powder
+ General Reagents) a) Dragadroff’s reagent b)
Hager’s reagent c)
Mayer’s reagent d)
Wagner’s reagent |
No brownish
red colour No yellow colouration No
creamy ppt No orange-brown ppt |
- - - - |
|
|
VII)
Oils (Powder
+ Filter paper) |
No greasy spot |
- |
|
|
VIII)
Flavanoids (Powder
+ Aqueous NaOH) |
No dark yellow colour |
- |
|
|
IX)
Starch (Powder + Iodine) |
Blue colour |
+ |
|
|
X)
Steroids (Powder + Conc.H2SO4) |
Reddish
brown colour |
+ |
CONCLUSION:
In the present study,
some pharmacognostical parameters such as macroscopical characteristics, florescence analysis of
drugs as well as preliminary examination of the stem powder for organoleptic characteristics and general chemical tests
have been carried out. In conclusion these studies can be used successfully in
commercial and routine laboratory works for identification of powder drug from Fagonia schweinfurthii
prior using in any herbal formulations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
We are thankful to Dr. B. P. Nagori,
(Director, Pharmacy Wing) for providing us a platform
for this research work.
We are especially thankful to Professor (Dr.) G.K.
Singh, (Head, Dept. of Pharmacognosy) for his valuable guidance and precious
time.
REFERENCES:
1.
“Quality Control Methods for Medicinal Plant Materials” World Health
Organization, Geneva, AITRS Publisher and Distributors, New Delhi, 2002, 14-17, 33-36,
51-52.
2.
Jarald E. E., Jarald S. E., “Text
Book of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry” C. B. S. Publisher and Distributers,
New Delhi, 2006, 105-106.
3.
Khandelwal K. R., “Practical Pharmacognosy” 12th
edition, published by Nirali Prakashan,
Pune, 2004, 157-164.
4.
The useful plants of India, Publications and Information Directorate
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, 1992, 15.
5.
Patel R., Jain D. K. et.al,
“Preliminary Phytochemical screening of Tephrosia purpurea of Family Leguminoceae”,
Research J. Pharm. Phyto., 2010, Vol
2(4) 301-302.
6.
Muhammad, A., Zaman K., Freed S., “Pharmacognostical studies and evaluation of total phenolic contents from trunk bark of Spondias
magnifera Willd.” Natural
Product Radiance, 2009, Vol. 8(2), 146-150.
7.
Bhattacharjee S. K., “Handbook of Medicinal Plants” 4th
revised edition, 2009, 15-16.
8.
Agarwal S. S., Paridhavi M.
“Herbal Drug Technology” published by University Press India Ltd., Hyderabad, 2007, 324-326.
9.
Duester,
J., “Antipyretic (fever reducing) plant in Dhofar”
Research Journal of Medicinal Plant, 2001, 292.
10. Madhavan V., Mohamed S. U. et.al, “Pharmacognostical
studies on the leaves of Cocculus hirsutus (Linn.)
Diels- Chilahinta Ayurvedic
drug” Indian J. of Natural Products and Resources, 2010, Vol. 1(1), 38-43.
11. Shukla S. H., Mistry
H. A. et.al, “Pharmacognostical,
Preliminary Phytochemical studies and analgesic activity of Amomum subulatum Roxb.”
Pharma Sci. Monitor, 2010, Vol
1(1), 90-100.
12. Bhandari M. M., “Flora of the Indian
Desert”, 2nd revised edition, Published by MPS Repros,
Jodhpur, 1990, 289.
13. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/
accessed on 15/03/2011.
14. Shehab N. et.al, “Chemical Constituents and Biological
Activities of Fagonia indica”
Research J. of Medicinal
Plants, 2003, Vol. 3, 13-16.
15. Madhavan V., Tomar
G. S. et.al, “Pharmacognostical
studies on Flickingeria nodosa (Dalz.) Seidenf. Stem and pseudobulbs – A botanical source of the Ayurvedic
drug Jivanti” Indian J. of Natural Products and
Resources, 2010, Vol. 1(1), 22 - 28.
16. Eman A. A., “Morphological, phytochemical and biological screening on three
Egyptian species of Fagonia”
Academia Arena, 2011, Vol 3(1), 18.
17. Aishwarya G., kambhoja
S., “Pharmacognostical Investigation of Argyreia speciosa leaf,
Indian J. Nat. Prod., 2009, Vol 25(2), 18.
18. Madhavan V., Tijare
R. D. et.al, “Pharmacognostical
studies on the stem tubers of Asparagus gonoclados Baker- Alternate source for the Ayurvedic drug Shatavari”, Indian
J. of Natural Products and Resources, 2010, Vol. 1(1), 57-62.
19. Priyadarsini S. S., Vadivu
R., Jayshree N., “Pharmacognostical
Standardisation of Leaves of Ravenala madagascariensis” Research J. Pharm. Phyto., 2010, Vol 2(4), 288-292.
20. Singh, V. and Pandey, R. P., “Ethnobotany of
Rajasthan, India” Scientific Publisher, Jodhpur, 1998, 64.
21. Kokate C. K., “Practical
Pharmacognosy” 1st ed., Vallabh Prakashan, New Delhi, 2005, 123-124.
22. Kokate C. K. et.al, “Pharmacognosy” 32nd ed., published by Nirali
Prakashan, Pune, 1999, 99, 109-114.
23. Zalvadiya V. I., Shah V. K. et.al, “Preliminary Phytochemical
screening of Erythrina indica”
Research J. Pharm. Phyto., 2010, Vol
2(3), 220-224.
24. Patil V. V., Pimprikar
R. B. et.al, “Pharmacognostical
studies and evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of Ficus bengalensis Linn.” J. of Young
Pharmacists, 2009, Vol 1(1) 49-53.
25. Reviews on Indian medicinal
plants, Indian Council of Medicinal Research, Vol. 1, New Delhi, 288-297.
26. Chatterjee A., Satyesh
C. P., “The Treatise on Indian Medicinal Plants” Vol. 1, New Delhi, 1994, 8, 9,
17.
Received
on 12.10.2011
Modified on 18.11.2011
Accepted on 27.11.2011
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry.
4(1): Jan. - Feb. 2012, 7-10